SNAPSHOT STUDY · POLYMARKET RANK 5 IN SELECTED LIST
October Fed decision
No change at the October 2026 FOMC meeting
Books captured 2026-09-21T22:39:44.042Z. Listing metadata captured 2026-09-21T22:36:18.333Z. Provider batch started 2026-09-21T22:42:00.909Z. This page does not refresh automatically.
TL;DR
A narrow policy question is easier to define than broad macro sentiment. The observed venue gap is worth explaining, but cancellation and timing rules differ. No independent macro forecasting advantage is established.
Useful option for learning: Best for tracing an explicit decision source through comparison, EV sensitivity, and rule-exception checks.
Bid / hypothetical entry: selected Polymarket outcome bid 46.00¢, ask 47.00¢. A bid is buying interest; an ask is an offered entry price. Neither is guaranteed to remain available.
100-share illustration: 48.00 points of total cost with the assumed 1¢/share fee; 52.00 net upside on a full win; 48.00 maximum loss in the zero-payout state. At the midpoint benchmark, expected net is -1.50 points.
What exactly resolves?
Use the official FOMC decision and the exact target-range definition. A speech, an equity rally, or a headline about ‘rates’ does not establish the target change. Other tools may model a price move before the decision; that is not the decision itself.
The source rules name October 27–28, 2026. The decision and the contracts’ close times must be checked separately. Polymarket’s missing-statement fallback may extend beyond the displayed end date.
Are the two platforms asking the same question?
Polymarket uses the upper bound of the target range and has a no-statement fallback tied to the next scheduled meeting. Kalshi explicitly assigns a canceled scheduled meeting to the unchanged-rate bucket. These exceptions can produce different timing or payout behavior; do not certify a riskless cross-venue pair.
Polymarket
Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the October 2026 meeting?
Kalshi
Will the Federal Reserve Hike rates by 0bps at their October 2026 meeting?
Is there room at the quoted price?
Depth below is measured from the captured book within 2¢ of each side’s best ask. The 100- and 1,000-share examples consume successive ask levels. These are snapshots of visible entry liquidity, not reservations, total market capacity, or exit guarantees. Kalshi asks are derived as 1 minus the opposing bid with its available quantity.
| Venue / outcome | Bid / ask | Spread | At best ask | Within +2¢ | 100-share avg | 1,000-share avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymarket / Yes | 46.00¢ / 47.00¢ | 1.00¢ | 27,220 shares | 178,636 shares 85,940.83 quote units | 47.00¢ | 47.00¢ |
| Polymarket / No | 53.00¢ / 54.00¢ | 1.00¢ | 6,635 shares | 93,295 shares 51,341.47 quote units | 54.00¢ | 54.00¢ |
| Kalshi / YES | 49.00¢ / 50.00¢ | 1.00¢ | 34,830 shares | 63,131 shares 31,951.86 quote units | 50.00¢ | 50.00¢ |
| Kalshi / NO | 50.00¢ / 51.00¢ | 1.00¢ | 2,113 shares | 2,249 shares 1,149.52 quote units | 51.00¢ | 51.00¢ |
Reported 24h activity: Polymarket parent event 974,230 USD; selected contract 189,803 USD. Kalshi parent event 194,370 contracts; selected contract 75,814 contracts. These units are not interchangeable.
Both sides: upside is not the same as likelihood
One hypothetical share at each captured ask, before fees. The price is not a measured win probability. A winning share pays one unit; a losing share pays zero. Football ties and exceptional settlement can pay other amounts.
| Venue / outcome | Entry cost | Net if full win | Loss if zero payout | Return if full win |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymarket / Yes | 47.00¢ | 53.00¢ | 47.00¢ | 112.77% |
| Polymarket / No | 54.00¢ | 46.00¢ | 54.00¢ | 85.19% |
| Kalshi / YES | 50.00¢ | 50.00¢ | 50.00¢ | 100.00% |
| Kalshi / NO | 51.00¢ | 49.00¢ | 51.00¢ | 96.08% |
Return if win is conditional net gain ÷ entry cost. It is not expected return, annualized return, or a recommendation. Fees lower the gain and increase the amount at risk.
Evidence and forecasting thesis
No economic forecasting model has been backtested here. The midpoint benchmark plus sensitivity analysis makes the required probability hurdle explicit without converting market sentiment into a claimed fact.
- Official inflation and employment releases, revisions, and their relevance to the policy reaction function.
- Public policy communication versus the actual FOMC vote; neither an individual speech nor a stock move is a decision.
- Meeting cancellation or statement delay, which affects both timing and exceptional settlement.
What would invalidate the assessment: An unscheduled policy move, altered meeting schedule, or revised data can make the old benchmark obsolete. Re-read both contracts before carrying any comparison forward.
Risk profile: Discrete policy surprises, multiple mutually exclusive policy buckets, and costs that can consume a small price gap. ‘No change’ is not inherently a low-risk outcome.
FOMC calendar and statements — Named official source for the policy decision and schedule. These are verification sources, not evidence that the future outcome has occurred.
Federal Reserve open-market policy — Check the target-range definition and published change. These are verification sources, not evidence that the future outcome has occurred.
Probability model and payoff sensitivity
The starting benchmark is the captured Polymarket bid–ask midpoint, 46.50%. No validated independent model justifies changing it. Lower and higher scenarios move this assumption by five percentage points; they are not confidence bounds or recommendations. Figures use 100 shares at the best ask plus an illustrative 1¢ per share total fee allowance. Larger entries require the depth simulation.
| Scenario | Assumed probability | Expected net points | Full binary Kelly |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower assumption | 41.50% | -6.50 | 0.00% |
| Market benchmark | 46.50% | -1.50 | 0.00% |
| Higher assumption | 51.50% | 3.50 | 6.73% |
Formula: expected net = N × [p(win) + 0.5 × p(tie) − entry − fee]. The binary table assumes p(tie)=0. Break-even under that assumption is 48.00%. A better-looking result after increasing p proves only that the calculation responds to p.
Change the assumptions
This paper simulator sweeps the captured Polymarket ask ladder. It uses no live quotes and places no orders. The default 1¢ fee per share is an illustrative total cost allowance, not a verified platform fee. Add slippage through the captured ladder; no exit fee or future price is known.
- Modeled average entry
- 47¢
- Total fictional cost
- 48
- Net if win
- 52
- Net if lose
- -48
- Expected net result
- -1.5
- Break-even win probability
- 48%
- Full Kelly (theoretical)
- 0%
Kelly assumes a binary payout and that your probability and cost estimates are correct; this is not an allocation recommendation. A positive result follows from the assumptions; it does not validate them.
Every tool’s contribution
Observed inputs, calculated outputs, actual provider responses, and tools that cannot support this study are identified separately. All sixteen learning tools are accounted for.
Financial Evidence: EODHD + Jev Executed; context only
- Input
- EODHD symbol SPY.US; exact question and rules sent for article classification.
- Output
- 20 daily records; latest 2026-09-21: 773.5000 in quoted instrument units. Article labels: unrelated 4, insufficient 1.
- How it affects this assessment
- Daily prices and proxies do not resolve a sports result, election, policy decision, or intraminute barrier. Same-day bars may be incomplete. Article confidence concerns the classification, never the event’s chance.
AI Market Analyzer Unavailable for this run
- Input
- Title, rule text, metadata price 46.50%, and identical assumed probability; no assumed advantage.
- Output
- HTTP 429: daily free-use limit reached; no result generated.
- How it affects this assessment
- Do not turn an AI-written explanation into a second independent forecast. Access limits were respected; no quota or entitlement bypass was attempted.
Drift Radar Executed; rejected for outcome modeling
- Input
- Polymarket condition 0xdf9bf27ee5757c55b44b8b9826ddc9ec3a8809aa3278634c45edbb7fc8f1a3e3; model google/timesfm-2.5-200m-pytorch.
- Output
- Spot 46.50% → terminal median 46.50%; p10 46.50%, p90 46.50%; quality low_data; stale cache no.
- How it affects this assessment
- These are contract-price projections, not event probabilities. All captured forecasts were flagged low_data; very narrow bands do not establish certainty. They receive no probability-model weight.
Research Workspace Executed; excluded from probability
- Input
- Research API topic: Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the October 2026 meeting?.
- Output
- HTTP 200; signal score 25/100; returned confidence High.
- How it affects this assessment
- The current endpoint does not return inspectable citations for its numeric signal. These are actual returned labels, not measured probabilities or verified news statistics. They receive no numerical weight in this assessment.
Market Browser Observed
- Input
- Selected contract 2589812; outcome Yes.
- Output
- Order-book bid 46.00¢, ask 47.00¢, midpoint 46.50%. The separate Gamma metadata ask was 47.00¢.
- How it affects this assessment
- Use the book snapshot for price and size math. The midpoint is a market benchmark, not an independent forecast. Metadata and books were fetched at different times.
Daily Market Desk Assessed
- Input
- The selected question, its rules, quote timestamps, and provider status.
- Output
- Study priority: verify the rules first; inspect 178,636 displayed shares within 2¢ of the selected Polymarket ask; then review the model-quality flags.
- How it affects this assessment
- This is a completed research checklist. High activity changes what is interesting to observe, not what is true.
Cross-Platform Comparison Observed; equivalence unproven
- Input
- Specific first-outcome/YES contracts on both venues.
- Output
- Midpoints: Polymarket 46.50%; Kalshi 49.50%. Difference: -3.00 percentage points.
- How it affects this assessment
- Do not interpret this as a forecast advantage. See the detailed rule comparison; Bitcoin is explicitly a different threshold and time window.
Dual Market View Match reviewed
- Input
- Same topic, explicit outcome mapping, and both sets of rules.
- Output
- Jev rule check: different; classification confidence 89.00%.
- How it affects this assessment
- Semantic similarity alone does not verify a hedge. The editorial comparison is the operative explanation; Jev is a separate, fallible check.
Triple Market View Not established
- Input
- Polymarket and Kalshi selected contracts.
- Output
- No matching Metaculus question was verified for this study. No third estimate was inserted or averaged.
- How it affects this assessment
- Two venues do not become three independent forecasts by adding an AI score. The third-view tool remains available for a separately verified match.
Vig & Implied Probability Calculator Calculated
- Input
- Polymarket first-outcome ask 47.00¢ and opposite-outcome ask 54.00¢.
- Output
- Sum 101.00¢; overround 1.00 percentage points. Normalized first-outcome quote 46.53%.
- How it affects this assessment
- This describes the two asks, not the platform fee or an objective probability. Costs must be modeled separately.
Arbitrage Scanner Arithmetic only; not certified
- Input
- Opposite-side asks across the two venues, before fees and without guaranteeing simultaneous fills.
- Output
- Poly first outcome + Kalshi NO: 98.00¢. Kalshi YES + Poly opposite: 104.00¢.
- How it affects this assessment
- One unit of combined payout is not guaranteed when rules differ. A sum below 100¢ is not sufficient evidence of arbitrage. Unlike the standalone two-YES calculator, these sums use actual opposite-side books.
Expected Value Calculator Calculated from assumptions
- Input
- 100 hypothetical shares, entry 47.00¢, benchmark p=46.50%, assumed fee 1¢/share.
- Output
- Cost 48.00 points; expected net -1.50; if win 52.00; if lose -48.00. Break-even p=48.00%.
- How it affects this assessment
- EV = shares × (assumed win probability − entry − assumed fee). The standalone calculator omits this fee allowance; its equivalent stake is 100 × entry. Football values here condition on a decisive result.
Kelly Criterion Calculator Calculated; hypothetical only
- Input
- Binary formula max(0, (p − entry)/(1 − entry)); p=46.50%.
- Output
- Gross full Kelly 0.00%; with the illustrative fee 0.00%. Half Kelly 0.00%.
- How it affects this assessment
- The market midpoint is no independent probability advantage. A positive output after manually increasing p would follow from that assumption, not establish an allocation recommendation.
Parlay Builder Dependence sensitivity
- Input
- This event at the benchmark 46.50% plus a purely illustrative second event at 50%.
- Output
- Independence product 23.25%; mathematically possible joint range 0.00%–46.50% without an independence assumption.
- How it affects this assessment
- No second real-world forecast is asserted. Shared drivers can invalidate multiplication. The midterms contract is already a joint event: do not multiply it by another chamber probability.
Historical Calibration Not yet measurable
- Input
- Prospective paper forecast p=46.50%; outcome unresolved at capture.
- Output
- If binary YES, Brier contribution 0.2862; if NO, 0.2162. No realized score is assigned.
- How it affects this assessment
- These are prospective score calculations, not evidence of accuracy. The existing calibration chart includes seed data and is not a backtest of this forecast.
Portfolio Tracker Paper ledger only
- Input
- A hypothetical 100-share entry using the captured ask ladder.
- Output
- Modeled entry value 47.00 points at average 47.00¢; plus a 1-point illustrative entry-fee allowance. No real position exists.
- How it affects this assessment
- A complete ledger also needs side, timestamp, rules, fee assumption, later mark, and outcome. Do not sum related studies as though their risks were independent.
Actual provider outputs: inspect before trusting
Jev returned different for the rule comparison, with classification confidence 89.00% using jev-1.13.0. This is not the event’s probability. The request rubric and full distribution are in the evidence download.
Drift forecast window: 2026-09-21T23:42:18.204819Z to 2026-10-29T00:42:18.204819Z. Quality flag: low_data. Rejected for probability modeling. Near-zero variation in a projected band is not proof of low risk.
SPY.US price history and articles are broad market context, not the FOMC’s target-rate decision. Equity prices can move for unrelated earnings or geopolitical reasons.
EODHD returned 20 daily records for SPY.US. Latest record: 2026-09-21, close 773.5000 in quoted instrument units. Retrieval: 2026-09-21T22:42:01.126Z. Same-day values may not be final. No election, policy, or touch-threshold probability was derived from them.
- Bond King Jeffrey Gundlach Wants Out of the AI 'Epicenter': Inside His Zero-Exposure Portfolio
2026-09-21T18:00:17.000Z · unrelated · classification confidence 88.00%
- Psoriatic Arthritis Market Landscape: 6 Key Late-Stage Drugs Set to Drive Future Growth | DelveInsight
2026-09-21T17:00:00.000Z · unrelated · classification confidence 98.00%
- S&P 500 Will ‘Easily’ Top 8,000 Before Historic Crash, ‘Black Swan’ Fund Manager Says
2026-09-21T16:54:14.000Z · unrelated · classification confidence 57.00%
- Corning Climbs 6% as AI Optical Interconnect Demo Highlights Its Fiber; Lumentum, Coherent and Applied Optoelectronics Rise 4%
2026-09-21T16:46:52.000Z · unrelated · classification confidence 98.00%
- Stocks, Bonds Climb as Oil Falls on US-Iran Hopes
2026-09-21T15:55:51.000Z · insufficient · classification confidence 23.00%
Raw Research and Analyzer responses — unverified, excluded from probability
Returned narratives and numeric labels may contain unsupported claims. HTTP 429 means no result was generated. These records document tool behavior, not verified news or advice.
{
"research": {
"status": 200,
"body": {
"topic": "Will there be no change in Fed interest rates after the October 2026 meeting?",
"keywords": [
{
"term": "Fed interest rates",
"score": 95,
"trend": "rising"
},
{
"term": "FOMC meeting October 2026",
"score": 88,
"trend": "rising"
},
{
"term": "Federal funds rate",
"score": 80,
"trend": "rising"
},
{
"term": "Inflation",
"score": 75,
"trend": "rising"
},
{
"term": "Rate hike probability",
"score": 68,
"trend": "rising"
},
{
"term": "Economic projections",
"score": 60,
"trend": "stable"
},
{
"term": "Goldman Sachs forecast",
"score": 55,
"trend": "rising"
},
{
"term": "CME FedWatch Tool",
"score": 50,
"trend": "rising"
}
],
"coverageIndex": 90,
"coverageTrend": "accelerating",
"coverageChangePct": 45,
"sentimentScore": -70,
"sentimentTrend": "stable",
"signalScore": 25,
"signalDirection": "bearish",
"interpretation": "Recent news overwhelmingly indicates a high probability of a Fed interest rate hike at the October 2026 FOMC meeting. The September 2026 meeting saw a 25 basis point increase, and the majority of Fed officials' projections, along with analyst commentary, point towards at least one more hike this year due to persistent inflation and strong economic data. The market is pricing in a significant chance of a 25 basis point hike in October.",
"leadingIndicators": [
"CME FedWatch Tool probabilities for October 2026 meeting",
"Upcoming inflation data releases (CPI, PCE)",
"Statements and speeches from Federal Reserve officials"
],
"watchNext": [
"October 27-28, 2026 FOMC meeting",
"September CPI and PCE inflation reports",
"Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh's public appearances"
],
"confidence": "High",
"dataWindow": "7 days"
}
},
"analyzer": {
"status": 429,
"body": {
"error": "You've used your free AI analysis for today. Upgrade to Premium for unlimited access.",
"usage": {
"feature": "ai_analyzer",
"used": 1,
"limit": 1,
"remaining": 0,
"resetAt": "2026-09-22T00:00:00.000Z",
"isPremium": false,
"enforced": true
},
"isPremium": false,
"requestId": "874aed0f-db83-4b37-9ed5-ff55e71fa43f"
}
}
}Costs, participation mechanics, and limits
- Entering: choosing a side, size, and price is different from receiving a fill. A limit can remain unfilled; crossing available quotes can consume multiple levels. These pages place no orders.
- Exiting: today’s entry depth says nothing certain about future bids. Early exit introduces a future-price assumption and may add fees. A marked gain is not a realized payout.
- Fees: all five captured Polymarket markets report fees enabled; the legacy fee endpoint returns base_fee 1000. This study does not interpret that as a flat 10% charge. Use the current market-specific schedule and rounding. Kalshi’s series fee type is quadratic_with_maker_fees; overrides and execution type can matter.
- Time and settlement: distinguish the event time, order close, resolution, dispute period, and withdrawal availability. Holding time and currency/funding costs are excluded from the scenario.
- Eligibility and access: platform and regional rules apply. Educational access to these pages does not establish eligibility to transact on either venue.
- Concentration: related topics may move together. The five studies are a learning set, not a diversified portfolio or an allocation proposal.
Repeat the paper exercise
Write the exact condition, timestamp, selected outcome, initial probability, evidence, and your reason for any change. Record the modeled entry and assumed costs. After official resolution, revisit the original forecast; do not backfill a winning prediction.
Existing EV/Kelly handoffs exclude the illustrative fee. They use the captured best ask and hypothetical inputs; the live tool may display different data if refreshed.